US

Trump arrives at federal appeals court in New York to overturn verdict in E. Jean Carroll $83.3million defamation case


Donald Trump appeared at a federal appeals court in New York on Friday as his lawyers fought to overturn the verdict in the $83.3million lawsuit that found him liable for defaming journalist E. Jean Carroll. 

The former president’s motorcade was seen pulling up to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan where attorneys presented oral arguments before a panel of three judges – all of whom were appointed to the bench by Democratic presidents.

Dressed in his trademark navy suit and bright red tie, Trump entered the courtroom and walked straight past Carroll, who was sitting in the front row of the public gallery.

It marks the presidential candidate’s first time in court since his assassination attempt in July, and security was tight, with attendees required to go through metal detectors upon arrival. 

All phones and other electronics were banned from the courtroom.

E. Jean Carroll was snapped leaving court on Friday, flanked by her attorney

Donald Trump appeared in court in New York on Friday as his lawyers fought to overturn the verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll (pictured on Friday) 

In his two-minute rebuttal, Trump's attorney John Sauer - pictured in  a court sketch on Friday - called the case 'a textbook example of implausible allegations' and a 'quintessential "he said, she said" case'

In his two-minute rebuttal, Trump’s attorney John Sauer – pictured in  a court sketch on Friday – called the case ‘a textbook example of implausible allegations’ and a ‘quintessential ‘he said, she said’ case’

The Republican nominee is contesting the May 2023 verdict stemming from his alleged mid-1990s encounter with Carroll, who claimed Trump sexually assaulted her at Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room and later defamed her when he publicly denied her allegations

His attorneys claim the trial court erred by allowing in certain evidence such as the infamous Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump can be heard boasting about grabbing women’s genitals, as well as testimony from other women who have accused him of sexual misconduct decades ago. 

In his two-minute rebuttal, Trump’s attorney John Sauer called the case ‘a textbook example of implausible allegations being propped up by highly inflammatory, inadmissible’ evidence. 

He also reiterated Trump’s claims from his testimony that the presidential candidate has never ‘even met’ Carroll.

Addressing the panel, Sauer called the lawsuit a ‘quintessential ‘he said, she said’ case’ that was lacking in ‘physical evidence’, ‘eyewitnesses’, and police records. 

Circuit Judge Denny Chin interrupted Sauer’s argument, noting it’s ‘very hard to overturn a jury verdict based on evidentiary rulings’ and asked him why the verdict should be thrown out. 

Sauer questioned US District Judge Lewis Kaplan’s decision to allow the Access Hollywood tape and testimony from Jessica Leeds, who accused Trump of groping her on a plane in the late 1970s, to be heard as evidence. 

Carroll, who claimed she was sexually assaulted by Trump at a department store dressing room in the 1990s, was also present at the hearing on Friday

Carroll, who claimed she was sexually assaulted by Trump at a department store dressing room in the 1990s, was also present at the hearing on Friday 

The former president's motorcade was seen pulling up to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday morning

The former president’s motorcade was seen pulling up to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday morning

Protesters holding up placards reading 'guilty', 'rapist' and 'felon', had gathered outside the Manhattan federal appeals court on Friday ahead of the hearing

Protesters holding up placards reading ‘guilty’, ‘rapist’ and ‘felon’, had gathered outside the Manhattan federal appeals court on Friday ahead of the hearing

He argued that the statute that would deem Trump’s alleged conduct a crime wasn’t enacted until 15 years later.

But Judge Chin asked if Trump ‘put his hands up her skirt’, wouldn’t that count?

Sauer reiterated that Leeds’s evidence should have been excluded.

Judge Chin pressed Sauer further about the Access Hollywood tape and said that it was a ‘confession about a modus operandi’.

Responding to Sauer’s arguments before the panel, Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan stood by the evidence presented at the trial. 

She insisted that Leeds’s testimony was admissible under a law that was in effect in 1979, and therefore the incident would have been considered a crime as the trial judge, Lewis Kaplan, concluded. 

The lawyer also argued that Trump has a ‘pattern’ of attacking women that begins with ‘pleasantly chatting’ them up before suddenly ‘pouncing’ on them and subsequently trashing the women when he is accused. 

She added that Trump had refused to testify or even attend the trial despite being given the opportunity. 

A jury found that Trump was liable for sexually assaulting Carroll, a journalist, at a department store in Manhattan in the mid-1990s.

Jurors awarded the former Elle magazine advice columnist a respective $2.02million and $2.98million for her sexual assault and defamation claims.

Carroll departed court flanked by her attorney Roberta Kaplan, who said she stood by the evidence presented at the trial

Carroll departed court flanked by her attorney Roberta Kaplan, who said she stood by the evidence presented at the trial

The writer, who was wore dark blazer and suit with a navy blue hair ribbon, did not talk with reporters after arguments ended

The writer, who was wore dark blazer and suit with a navy blue hair ribbon, did not talk with reporters after arguments ended

Trump was separately found liable for defaming Carroll in a second trial that took place in January this year where a jury ordered him to pay her $83.3million for having defamed her and damaging her reputation in June 2019 after she first accused him of rape.

In both denials, Trump said he didn’t know Carroll, that she was ‘not my type,’ and that she made up her story to promote her memoir. 

In their appeal, filed in November, Trump’s lawyers claimed he couldn’t get a fair trial in New York

The former president claimed that federal judge Lewis Kaplan ‘erred’ in rulings during the May 2023 trial that ‘violated President Trump’s rights’. 

The filing stated: ‘The improper verdict in this case is a gross miscarriage of justice, backed by political operatives long opposed to President Trump and his politics, based on false and unsupported claims’

In other legal filings, Trump’s lawyers claimed the attack on Carroll ‘never occurred’.

He accused her of making the claims because of her ‘significant political bias against him’ and ‘turned her allegations against (Trump) into a lifestyle and sought to monetize her allegations as much as possible’.

Rather than being harmed by the claims, Carroll’s standing has improved due to her media interviews, Trump’s lawyers claimed.

The Republican presidential candidate spoke to the media during a press conference at Trump Tower after the court hearing

The Republican presidential candidate spoke to the media during a press conference at Trump Tower after the court hearing

Trump is pictured taking the stand during the second civil trial where E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in January

Trump is pictured taking the stand during the second civil trial where E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in January 

Carroll’s cases are separate from multiple criminal cases against the former US president. 

Trump is due to be sentenced on September 18 at a state court in New York for falsifying business records relating to a $130,000 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.

Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts earlier this year after a blockbuster trial.

He is also facing a $450million fine after losing a civil fraud case brought by New York state prosecutors, and two possible criminal trials in Washington and Atlanta over election interference.

Neither of the trials are expected to take place before the election.

A third criminal case in Florida related to mishandling classified documents was recently thrown out by a judge. Her decision is being appealed by prosecutors.

Trump denies all the allegations.



Source link

Back to top button