UK test and trace data can be handed to police, reveals memorandum

As if things were not going badly enough for the UK’s COVID-19 test and trace service, it now seems police will be able to access some test data, prompting fear that the disclosure could deter people who should have tests from coming forward.

As revealed in the Health Service Journal (paywalled), Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) guidance describing how testing data will be handled was updated on Friday.

The memorandum of understanding between DHSC and National Police Chiefs’ Council said forces could be allowed to access test information that tells them if a “specific individual” has been told to self-isolate.

A failure to self-isolate after getting a positive COVID-19 test or being in contact with someone who has tested positive, could result in a police fine of £1,000, or even a £10,000 penalty for those serial offenders or those seriously breaking the rules.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “It is a legal requirement for people who have tested positive for COVID-19 and their close contacts to self-isolate when formally notified to do so.

“The DHSC has agreed a memorandum of understanding with the National Police Chiefs Council to enable police forces to have access on a case-by-case basis to information that enables them to know if a specific individual has been notified to self-isolate.

We are already concerned that some people are deterred from being tested because they are anxious about loss of income should they need to self-isolate – and we are worried should police involvement add to this

“The memorandum of understanding ensures that information is shared with appropriate safeguards and in accordance with the law. No testing or health data is shared in this process,” the spokesperson said.

But others are concerned about the influence data sharing with police might have on people’s willingness to use the service, considered a vital plank of the UK’s efforts to contain a second wave of the novel coronavirus outbreak.

A spokesperson for doctors union the British Medical Association said: “For the test and trace system to be effective it needs to have the full confidence of the public, with transparency about the appropriate and secure use of their data.

“We are already concerned that some people are deterred from being tested because they are anxious about loss of income should they need to self-isolate – and we are worried should police involvement add to this,” the spokesperson said.

The UK government’s emphasis should be on providing support to people – financial and otherwise – if they need to self-isolate, so that no one is deterred from coming forward for a test, the BMA spokesperson added.

The UK’s test and trace system, backed by £12bn in public money, was outsourced to Serco for £45m in June. Sitel is also a provider.

The service has had a bumpy ride to say the least. Earlier this month, it came to light that as many as 48,000 people were not informed they had come in close contact with people who had tested positive, as the service under-reported 15,841 novel coronavirus cases between 25 September and 2 October.

The use of Microsoft’s Excel spreadsheet program in transferring test results from labs to the health service to total up was at the heart of the problem. A plausible explanation emerged that test results were automatically fetched in CSV format by PHE from various commercial testing labs, and stored in rows in an older .XLS Excel format that limited the number of rows to 65,536 per spreadsheet, rather than the one-million row limit offered by the modern .XLSX file format.

But that was not the only miss-step. It has emerged that people in line for a coronavirus test were sent to a site in Sevenoaks, Kent, where, in fact, no test centre existed, according to reports.

Despite concerns about test and trace performance, the private sector service provider Serco increased its annual revenue guidance to £3.9bn from £3.7bn and underlying trading profit to £165m. Serco said its part in the test and trace programme was “limited and specific.” ®

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button