UK

High Court rules transgender women CAN go into female prisons

Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Swift, said the trans woman’s offending history was a factor that the existing policies were required to consider

The Government’s policy of housing transgender women in female prisons is lawful, the High Court ruled today – despite claims from an inmate it raised the risk of sex attacks.

A female prisoner, known only as FDJ, brought a legal challenge against a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) policy which allows prisoners to be housed according to their gender identity ‘irrespective of whether they have taken any legal or medical steps to acquire that gender’.

At a High Court hearing in March, lawyers for FDJ argued that accommodating transgender women in the female prison estate ‘exposes female prisoners to a risk of sexual assault that would not arise absent that allocation’.

They argued this was discrimination against cisgender women as that risk did not exist when transgender men are placed in men’s prisons.

However, the MoJ argued the policy pursued a legitimate aim, including ‘facilitating the rights of transgender people to live in and as their acquired gender (and) protecting transgender people’s mental and physical health’.

In today’s ruling, two High Court judges rejected FDJ’s claim and upheld the MoJ’s policies as lawful.

It follows cases of transgender female prisoners sexually assaulting fellow inmates.

In 2018, Karen White – who was born a man but was placed in women’s prison HMP New Hall after telling authorities of his identification as a woman – sexually assaulted two female inmates.

Prosecutors claimed White – who had a history of sex attacks – used a ‘transgender persona’ to gain access to vulnerable females. White was ordered to serve a life sentence in a male prison for the jail sex attacks.

In 2020, official figures showed that transgender prisoners carried out seven sex attacks on women in jail.

A female prisoner, known only as FDJ, brought a legal challenge against a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) policy which allows prisoners to be housed according to their gender identity 'irrespective of whether they have taken any legal or medical steps to acquire that gender'. File photo of an English prison

A female prisoner, known only as FDJ, brought a legal challenge against a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) policy which allows prisoners to be housed according to their gender identity ‘irrespective of whether they have taken any legal or medical steps to acquire that gender’. File photo of an English prison 

In 2018, Karen White (pictured) - who was born a man but was placed in women's prison HMP New Hall after telling authorities of his identification as a woman - sexually assaulted two female inmates

Karen is pictured in 2016, before her arrest, when she was known to cross-dress, but had not begun gender reassignment

It follows cases of transgender female prisoners sexually assaulting fellow inmates. In 2018, Karen White – who was born a man but was placed in women’s prison HMP New Hall after telling authorities of his identification as a woman – sexually assaulted two female inmates 

Lord Justice Holroyde said today: ‘It is not possible to argue that the defendant should have excluded from women’s prisons all transgender women.

‘To do so would be to ignore, impermissibly, the rights of transgender women to live in their chosen gender.’

FDJ had not asked for all transgender women to be excluded from female prisons, but instead challenged policies as to how trans women who have been convicted of sexual or violent offences against women were housed.

Prosecutors claimed White (pictured) - who had a history of sex attacks - used a 'transgender persona' to gain access to vulnerable females. White was ordered to serve a life sentence in a male prison for the jail sex attacks

Prosecutors claimed White (pictured) – who had a history of sex attacks – used a ‘transgender persona’ to gain access to vulnerable females. White was ordered to serve a life sentence in a male prison for the jail sex attacks 

However, Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Swift, said the trans woman’s offending history was a factor that the existing policies were required to consider.

‘The need to assess and manage all risks is repeatedly emphasised’ throughout the policies, he said.

The judge said that a transgender woman, whether or not she has changed her legal gender with a gender recognition certificate (GRC), who is deemed suitable to live in the general population may be subject to restrictions.

He continued: ‘In an exceptional case, a high-risk transgender woman, even with a GRC, can be transferred to the male estate because of the higher level of security which is there available.’

The court also heard expert panels were also involved in the process when allocating transgender prisoners and are ‘expressly required’ to consider the trans woman’s offending history, her anatomy and her sexual behaviours and relationships.

Lord Justice Holroyde continued: ‘They can, in my view, be expected to be astute to detect any case of a male prisoner who, for sinister reasons, is merely pretending to wish to live in the female gender.’

He concluded: ‘The policies require a careful, case-by-case assessment of the risks and of the ways in which the risks should be managed.

Transgender inmates carried out seven sex attacks on women in jail, figures show

Transgender prisoners have carried out seven sex attacks on women in jail, official figures from 2020 showed.

In 2018, a convicted rapist was moved to women’s jail HMP New Hall and sexually assaulted two women inmates.

Karen White dressed as a woman but was still legally a man and had not undergone surgery. She was jailed for life in 2018 by a judge who branded her a ‘highly manipulative’ predator. 

 In response to a Parliamentary question from former Labour Party General Secretary Baroness McDonagh, Ministers have revealed there have been several other sexual assaults by trans prisoners.

The MoJ said: ‘Since 2010, out of the 124 sexual assaults that occurred in the female estate a total of seven of those were sexual assaults against females in custody perpetrated by transgender individuals.’ 

It means that although trans women make up about one per cent of the 3,600 female jail population, they are to blame for 5.6 per cent of sexual assaults there. The attacks took place at HMP Low Newton, HMP Foston Hall, HMP Peterborough (Female) and HMP Bronzefield as well as HMP New Hall.

The MoJ said it did not know if the culprits had been punished, saying this information was ‘not held centrally’. It also insisted there had been ‘no reported incidents of any type of sexual assault against prison officers by trans prisoners’, despite claims to the contrary.

 

‘Properly applied, that assessment has the result that non-transgender prisoners only have contact with transgender prisoners when it is safe for them to do so.’

FDJ claimed she was sexually assaulted in prison in 2017 by a trans woman with a GRC which is not admitted by the MoJ.

Her barrister argued that transgender inmates are five times more likely to carry out sexual attacks in women’s prisons, referencing a statistic provided in response to a parliamentary question.

However, this claim was rejected by the judges, who described it as ‘a misuse of the statistics’.

The judge said the statistics on transgender women in women’s prisons were ‘unsatisfactory’ and said it was clear the numbers were small.

Lord Justice Holroyde added: ‘I can accept, at any rate for present purposes, that the unconditional introduction of a transgender woman into the general population of a women’s prison carries a statistically greater risk of sexual assault upon non-transgender prisoners than would be the case if a non-transgender woman were introduced.

‘But that statistical conclusion takes no account of the risk assessment which the policies require.’

However, Lord Justice Holroyde noted the vulnerability of many women in prison, saying: ‘I readily accept that a substantial proportion of women prisoners have been the victims of sexual assaults and/or domestic violence.’

He also said he fully understood FDJ’s concerns, adding that some women prisoners ‘may suffer fear and acute anxiety if required to share prison accommodation and facilities with a transgender woman who has male genitalia and that their fear and anxiety may be increased if that transgender woman has been convicted of sexual or violent offences against women’.

Responding to the ruling, FDJ said: ‘I am disappointed with today’s judgment, but I am pleased that the court recognised that women in prison are a vulnerable group and that many women in prison have been victims of domestic and sexual violence.

‘By bringing this challenge, I did not seek to prevent trans women in prison from living in dignity, or to exclude all trans women from women’s prisons.

‘However, I feel that trans women who have a history of violence and sexual offending against women should not be in a situation where they can put our safety at risk.’ 


Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button